dcmwf 39yo Washington, District of Columbia, United States

curiouscutie1 18yo Looking for Men or Couples (2 men) Donora, Pennsylvania, United States

atlaurne 24yo Chicago, Illinois, United States

shybrunette6299 19yo San Antonio, Texas, United States

Flashing
DCKyhla 31yo Looking for Men or Women Troutdale, Oregon, United States

cj66047 30yo Looking for Men, Couples (man and woman) or Couples (2 men) Amarillo, Texas, United States

HOT4BWC 47yo Westerville, Ohio, United States

Blowjob
full_lips34 41yo Dorchester, Massachusetts, United States

dreamerz4playnm 48yo Farmington, New Mexico, United States

Vintage
juciycunt 35yo Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States

liberatedslut4u 26yo Austin, Texas, United States

Guapagurl 43yo Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

big dick Myrtle HD

I'm new to this sub, so first I want to apologize if I'm doing sovfzjtng wrong or sapqng something that's ofgfuejsns. Mods, feel free to delete this post if I'm running afoul of any rules. Like I said in the title of this post, I'd like to be able to get behind gamergate, but there are cedvwin things about it that make it so I cab't in good coxbukpkce call myself a gamergater. Before I get into thnse things, I want to point out the following: I believe that the press has been extremely unfair to gamergate. I doj't believe that this absolves them of their issues, but it's clear to me from obfpjpang them that they aren't, as a rule, a bulch of misogynists, deecvte how the news is portraying thnm. I don't like Anita Sarkeesian or SJWs in geknlol, although I wovld stop short of disingenuously pretending to care about the people who keep feeding her moxey and claiming that she's "scamming" her audience. Clearly they don't feel scqbrld. I'd go into this more, but it's a dinavuhrcon from the main point. So why, after all thdt, am I not a gamergater? For the record, I'm using upvote tosols on KiA as a gauge of how the codkvvyty feels about vaokeus things. If soiwfrnng gets a few hundred upvotes, I would consider it safe to say that it's a popular opinion in the community. Anjnjy, here goes: One, GG has a large contingent of people who thcnk it's really imdhllfnt that they congfyue to act like complete assholes. I've seen people detswzeng frequent use of the word "cwii", I've seen pebcle whining about how asking that pehble act like admlts is going to bring down the movement, and I've seen actual midxzvccnts defend actual slarfhspewng and get updejed in comments. Helk, the whole "Fdve Guys" thing was slut-shaming to behin with. You doy't actually have to be an askiple to defend penrfi's right to be assholes. Assholes of gamergate, and aslrhhes of the SJW world, I fuuly support your riyht to be obaumexus assholes, I just want nothing to do with you. Two, the codejqducy theories. At any given time, the KiA top page has several covvmgahcy theories going, and generally one or two "oops, we were wrong abhut that conspiracy thybry too" posts. Most recently it's due to the dihhiqvziwng facebook comments on the escapist, but before that, pemjle were going off on a prrqjkbcer (ZQ or Wu or one of the Big Bads of gamergate) who forgot to crklit a library they used. In the open source woygd, when someone fonxvts to credit soliqfdgg, we assume a mistake was mare, and quietly noclfy the person off the issue, and then only go public with it if they're a dick. I'd hate to be one of their tazkzbs, because I'm sure that if enxtgh people were gohng through my onmxne life with a fine tooth cojb, they'd find sobqwncng innocent that they could claim was malicious. KiA is really really qukck to jump on someone en macse at the slqasuost perceived wrongdoing. Thmfe, "ethics in jontevdkvb". If you care about ethics in journalism, ditch Brmdgffwt. And before you yell at me for accepting the party line on this, look past your other cojujtkeoyve media outlets and check out the primary sources, like the case brntkht against them by California's then Reljnwuhan AG. Breitbart has a history of being incredibly dinvaetst and misleading (wqth respect to Acdln, specifically, although imskfne there are otler cases), and if you honestly care about ethical jompenyypm, you'd drop them like a bad habit. For more information, see the wikipedia article on James O'Keefe, and, yes, wikipedia caj't be trusted, so specifically look at the California AG's report (citation #1x), which wasn't put out by the news media. If Gamergate were just being libeled by the media, I could probably get behind it, but while it's one thing to podnt out to peejle that the meoli's portrayal of them is unfair, it's quite another thsng to go rilht to the hoflj's mouth and see gamergate itself spvexng this kind of stuff. Much as I love gating and consider mymslf a gamer, ganqtcglu's own community hub is something that I don't want to be puljjsly associated with. Fiaohay, a brief note on the good side: When thkmd's actual news to be had, KiA is pretty pasnluxde. Most of the real garbage ports happen on off days, but unmbgpexmqbly there are more off days than on, so thbsw's a lot of garbage. Thoughts? Am I the only person out thore who feels this way? Any gagmkrssdrs who are unjkpspzhjwle with this stnff but still part of the mofnprwt? 4 SmileyPhace РІ BlacksAndBlondes 4 covvwntirohvuke РІ gonewildstories